← Înapoi la Czech Keno 12/66Back to Czech Keno 12/66

🛸 UFO X-Ray — set 2, 9, 12, 17, 28, 31, 38, 43, 50, 52, 56, 61

Loteria: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · arhivă: 140,177 extrageri · scanare descriptivă — NU predicție · 18+ Lottery: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · archive: 140,177 draws · descriptive scan — NOT a prediction · 18+
📡 Camera de scanareScan chamber
2
frequency: 25,839× (18.43%)w50: · near averagegap: 2 / record 48
9
frequency: 25,771× (18.38%)w50: 11× · near averagegap: 1 / record 52
12
frequency: 25,528× (18.21%)w50: 10× · near averagegap: 3 / record 49
17
frequency: 25,658× (18.3%)w50: 12× · recently hotgap: 6 / record 45
28
frequency: 25,422× (18.14%)w50: · near averagegap: 1 / record 49
31
frequency: 25,671× (18.31%)w50: · near averagegap: 0 / record 54
38
frequency: 25,244× (18.01%)w50: · recently coldgap: 1 / record 60
43
frequency: 25,497× (18.19%)w50: · recently coldgap: 6 / record 50
50
frequency: 25,493× (18.19%)w50: · near averagegap: 4 / record 55
52
frequency: 25,363× (18.09%)w50: · recently coldgap: 13 / record 48
56
frequency: 25,289× (18.04%)w50: · near averagegap: 2 / record 58
61
frequency: 25,522× (18.21%)w50: 11× · near averagegap: 3 / record 42
🌡️ Starea termică a SETULUI — fereastra 50SET thermal state — 50-draw window
🟢 NEAR AVERAGE — close to expectation
103 hits in the last 50 draws · expected ≈109.1 · z=-0.71
❄ −3σ0🔥 +3σ
last 10 draws: 26 hits (expected ≈21.8) · ~2.18/draw
„Fierbinte" = mai multe hituri decât așteptatul pe ultimele 50 de extrageri; „rece" = mai puține. Stare OBSERVATĂ, nu tendință — fereastra recentă NU influențează următoarea extragere."Hot" = more hits than expected over the last 50 draws; "cold" = fewer. An OBSERVED state, not a trend — the recent window does NOT influence the next draw.
Graful de energie — chimia perechilor (observat vs așteptat, tot istoricul)Energy graph — pair chemistry (observed vs expected, full history)
9–504,433× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.85
9–124,432× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.84
2–314,422× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.68
12–614,415× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.58
9–384,413× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.54
2–504,409× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.48
show all 66 pairs
9–314,409× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.48
12–384,403× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.39
2–614,394× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.25
31–614,390× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.19
2–94,389× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.17
9–614,388× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.16
50–614,381× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.05
28–504,379× · expected ≈4,313 · z=1.02
17–314,377× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.99
28–434,372× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.91
17–614,364× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.79
12–524,360× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.72
2–174,355× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.65
9–284,354× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.63
28–314,354× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.63
43–504,354× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.63
2–384,352× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.6
2–524,352× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.6
52–564,345× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.49
38–504,336× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.35
2–124,334× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.32
17–284,334× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.32
43–614,332× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.29
12–284,322× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.14
9–174,319× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.09
9–524,318× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.08
31–524,317× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.06
31–504,314× · expected ≈4,313 · z=0.01
17–504,313× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.0
2–284,308× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.08
9–434,304× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.14
2–434,300× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.2
17–434,299× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.22
17–524,298× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.23
12–314,295× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.28
17–384,293× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.31
31–564,290× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.36
12–504,285× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.44
9–564,283× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.47
12–174,279× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.53
17–564,275× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.59
28–614,273× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.62
43–564,272× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.64
38–614,270× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.67
38–524,266× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.73
31–384,265× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.74
2–564,256× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-0.88
52–614,248× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.01
50–524,240× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.13
38–564,228× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.32
43–524,223× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.39
12–564,222× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.41
31–434,219× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.46
56–614,213× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.55
38–434,189× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.92
12–434,187× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-1.95
28–524,171× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-2.2
28–384,163× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-2.32
50–564,152× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-2.49
28–564,126× · expected ≈4,313 · z=-2.89
Grosimea liniei = deviația față de așteptatul hipergeometric (z-score). Descriptiv — perechile nu au memorie.Line thickness = deviation vs the hypergeometric expectation (z-score). Descriptive — pairs have no memory.
🧲 Chimie avansată — triplete (fereastra 5.000)Advanced chemistry — triples (window 5,000)
most co-drawn
17–38–6146× · expected ≈24.0 · z=4.49
12–38–6138× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.85
17–52–6138× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.85
28–50–5635× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.24
9–43–5634× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.04
coldest
2–17–2814× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.05
12–31–5014× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.05
17–28–6114× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.05
12–43–5011× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.67
2–12–5010× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.87
Cvartete (top/bottom din 495)Quads (top/bottom of 495)
most co-drawn
17–38–52–6111× · expected ≈3.4 · z=4.08
12–17–52–6110× · expected ≈3.4 · z=3.54
9–43–56–619× · expected ≈3.4 · z=3.0
coldest
17–38–43–500× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
28–31–52–610× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
28–38–50–610× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
Din 220 triplete posibile ale setului, pe fereastra recentă. Observat vs așteptat hipergeometric — descriptiv, combinațiile nu au memorie.Out of 220 possible triples of the set, over the recent window. Observed vs hypergeometric expectation — descriptive, combinations have no memory.
📊 Distribuția hiturilor pe ultimele 5,000 extrageri — real vs contur teoreticHit distribution over the last 5,000 draws — observed vs theoretical ghost
0348
11,187
21,557
31,229
4520
5132
626
71
80
90
100
110
120
🎯 Praguri — șanse exacte & absențele setului (fereastra 5,000)Thresholds — exact odds & set absences (window 5,000)
thresholdexact oddsexpected (5,000)observedcurrent gapwindow record
≥1/121 in 1.14,6524,65204
≥2/121 in 1.43,4853,46516
≥3/121 in 2.71,8811,908117
≥4/121 in 7.2692679158
≥5/121 in 301691596190
≥6/121 in 18627272761,271
≥7/121 in 1,8462.71498498
≥8/121 in 30,3700.20never in window
≥9/121 in 886,6900.00never in window
≥10/121 in 51,768,0160.00never in window
≥11/121 in 7,585,330,4800.00never in window
≥12/121 in 4,922,879,481,5200.00never in window
Șansa exactă e hipergeometrică și IDENTICĂ la fiecare extragere — tabelul arată cum se compară observatul cu teoria. „Gap curent" = extrageri de la ultima dată când setul a prins ≥prag. Rândurile aurii = absență la nivel de record de fereastră (pur descriptiv).The exact odds are hypergeometric and IDENTICAL at every draw — the table shows how observation compares to theory. "Current gap" = draws since the set last hit ≥threshold. Gold rows = absence at window-record level (purely descriptive).
⚙️ Contribuția numerelor la hiturile setului (fereastra 5,000)Number contribution to the set's hits (window 5,000)
61959 hits · 8.8%
17946 hits · 8.7%
56946 hits · 8.7%
43917 hits · 8.4%
9916 hits · 8.4%
28908 hits · 8.3%
50905 hits · 8.3%
31901 hits · 8.3%
38885 hits · 8.1%
52878 hits · 8.1%
12876 hits · 8.0%
2854 hits · 7.8%
Uniform ar fi ≈8.3% per număr. Descriptiv — ponderea trecută nu se transferă în viitor.Uniform would be ≈8.3% per number. Descriptive — past share does not carry into the future.
💓 Puls — hituri per extragere (ultimele 120)Pulse — hits per draw (last 120)
🕳️ Gap-o-metre — gap curent / record istoric per numărGap gauges — current gap / historical record per number
2
2 / 48
9
1 / 52
12
3 / 49
17
6 / 45
28
1 / 49
31
0 / 54
38
1 / 60
43
6 / 50
50
4 / 55
52
13 / 48
56
2 / 58
61
3 / 42
Indicator pur descriptiv: cât de aproape e absența curentă de recordul istoric al numărului. Fiecare extragere e independentă.Purely descriptive: how close the current absence is to the number's historical record. Every draw is independent.
🧬 ADN-ul setului vs așteptatul formatuluiSet DNA vs format expectation
Set sum399μ=402.0 ±60.1
Odd numbers5/12μ=6.0
Spread (max−min)59μ=55.0
Decades covered7/7μ=6.04
Direct neighbours0μ=2.0
Radar: conturul plin = setul tău; conturul punctat = valoarea așteptată a formatului. Descriptiv.Radar: solid outline = your set; dotted outline = the format's expected value. Descriptive.
🖥️ Verdictul scaneruluiScanner verdict

Scan complete: 12-number set on Czech Keno 12/66 — 140,177 draws in the archive.

Thermal frame (last 50): 17 shows the highest recent frequency (12× vs 9.09 expected), while 52 sits at 5×.

Set thermal state (last 50 draws): NEAR AVERAGE — 103 total hits vs ~109.1 expected (z=-0.7). The recent window does NOT influence the next draw.

Absence gauge: 52 has a current gap of 13 draws (its historical record: 48). Descriptive only — every draw is independent.

Pair chemistry: 9–50 was co-drawn 4433× (expected ≈4313.1).

Over the last 5,000 draws the set hit 0 numbers 348×, 1 number 1187×, 2 numbers 1557×… (theoretical ghost overlaid in the chart). Max observed: 7/12.

Verdict: historical observations, NOT predictions — the odds of every combination are identical at every draw. 18+

Raport generat automat din datele reale (actualizat: 2026-07-17 08:52 UTC). Observații istorice descriptive — șansele oricărei combinații sunt identice la fiecare extragere. Joacă responsabil. 18+Report generated automatically from real data (updated: 2026-07-17 08:52 UTC). Descriptive historical observations — every combination has identical odds at every draw. Play responsibly. 18+