← Înapoi la Czech Keno 12/66Back to Czech Keno 12/66

🛸 UFO X-Ray — set 1, 9, 15, 19, 24, 31, 35, 41, 50, 51, 58, 65

Loteria: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · arhivă: 132,408 extrageri · scanare descriptivă — NU predicție · 18+ Lottery: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · archive: 132,408 draws · descriptive scan — NOT a prediction · 18+
📡 Camera de scanareScan chamber
1
frequency: 24,016× (18.14%)w50: · near averagegap: 5 / record 49
9
frequency: 24,342× (18.38%)w50: · near averagegap: 1 / record 52
15
frequency: 24,143× (18.23%)w50: 13× · recently hotgap: 1 / record 53
19
frequency: 24,129× (18.22%)w50: · near averagegap: 3 / record 50
24
frequency: 24,279× (18.34%)w50: · near averagegap: 2 / record 47
31
frequency: 24,249× (18.31%)w50: · near averagegap: 0 / record 54
35
frequency: 23,852× (18.01%)w50: 11× · near averagegap: 6 / record 53
41
frequency: 24,058× (18.17%)w50: · near averagegap: 6 / record 55
50
frequency: 24,054× (18.17%)w50: 13× · recently hotgap: 3 / record 55
51
frequency: 24,090× (18.19%)w50: · near averagegap: 0 / record 57
58
frequency: 23,997× (18.12%)w50: · recently coldgap: 13 / record 52
65
frequency: 23,929× (18.07%)w50: 11× · near averagegap: 8 / record 71
🌡️ Starea termică a SETULUI — fereastra 50SET thermal state — 50-draw window
🟢 NEAR AVERAGE — close to expectation
108 hits in the last 50 draws · expected ≈109.1 · z=-0.13
❄ −3σ0🔥 +3σ
last 10 draws: 17 hits (expected ≈21.8) · ~2.18/draw
„Fierbinte" = mai multe hituri decât așteptatul pe ultimele 50 de extrageri; „rece" = mai puține. Stare OBSERVATĂ, nu tendință — fereastra recentă NU influențează următoarea extragere."Hot" = more hits than expected over the last 50 draws; "cold" = fewer. An OBSERVED state, not a trend — the recent window does NOT influence the next draw.
Graful de energie — chimia perechilor (observat vs așteptat, tot istoricul)Energy graph — pair chemistry (observed vs expected, full history)
31–584,212× · expected ≈4,074 · z=2.19
9–244,209× · expected ≈4,074 · z=2.15
9–314,172× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.56
9–504,171× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.54
15–414,169× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.51
1–584,158× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.34
show all 66 pairs
9–354,152× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.24
19–244,142× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.08
1–314,138× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.02
19–514,138× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.02
24–514,138× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.02
15–654,135× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.97
9–654,129× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.87
1–244,125× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.81
15–314,121× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.75
9–194,120× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.73
15–504,118× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.7
15–354,117× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.68
1–354,115× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.65
41–514,113× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.62
9–414,111× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.59
24–504,111× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.59
19–584,109× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.56
9–584,107× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.52
31–414,102× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.44
51–654,101× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.43
51–584,098× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.38
1–514,096× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.35
19–314,095× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.33
24–354,092× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.28
15–194,090× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.25
9–514,088× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.22
24–584,085× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.17
31–504,085× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.17
31–514,085× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.17
31–654,085× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.17
35–414,080× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.09
58–654,070× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.07
35–504,069× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.08
41–584,068× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.1
41–504,064× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.16
9–154,062× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.19
15–244,062× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.19
1–94,060× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.22
50–654,059× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.24
24–314,058× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.26
24–654,055× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.3
1–194,052× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.35
1–504,048× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.42
1–154,047× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.43
35–514,045× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.46
31–354,044× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.48
15–584,040× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.54
1–414,035× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.62
35–654,035× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.62
35–584,031× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.69
24–414,028× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.73
19–654,027× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.75
50–584,026× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.77
19–504,018× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.89
19–414,012× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.99
41–654,004× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.12
1–653,999× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.19
19–353,990× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.34
50–513,980× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.5
15–513,968× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.69
Grosimea liniei = deviația față de așteptatul hipergeometric (z-score). Descriptiv — perechile nu au memorie.Line thickness = deviation vs the hypergeometric expectation (z-score). Descriptive — pairs have no memory.
🧲 Chimie avansată — triplete (fereastra 5.000)Advanced chemistry — triples (window 5,000)
most co-drawn
1–50–5141× · expected ≈24.0 · z=3.47
41–51–5841× · expected ≈24.0 · z=3.47
1–31–5037× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.65
1–31–5136× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.45
1–15–2435× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.24
coldest
9–19–5815× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.85
15–35–5015× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.85
15–41–5814× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.05
9–24–6512× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.46
24–41–5012× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.46
Cvartete (top/bottom din 495)Quads (top/bottom of 495)
most co-drawn
1–41–50–5112× · expected ≈3.4 · z=4.62
1–31–50–5111× · expected ≈3.4 · z=4.08
1–19–50–519× · expected ≈3.4 · z=3.0
coldest
15–41–51–580× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
19–41–58–650× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
24–35–41–500× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
Din 220 triplete posibile ale setului, pe fereastra recentă. Observat vs așteptat hipergeometric — descriptiv, combinațiile nu au memorie.Out of 220 possible triples of the set, over the recent window. Observed vs hypergeometric expectation — descriptive, combinations have no memory.
📊 Distribuția hiturilor pe ultimele 5,000 extrageri — real vs contur teoreticHit distribution over the last 5,000 draws — observed vs theoretical ghost
0316
11,200
21,625
31,177
4494
5160
627
71
80
90
100
110
120
🎯 Praguri — șanse exacte & absențele setului (fereastra 5,000)Thresholds — exact odds & set absences (window 5,000)
thresholdexact oddsexpected (5,000)observedcurrent gapwindow record
≥1/121 in 1.14,6524,68403
≥2/121 in 1.43,4853,48405
≥3/121 in 2.71,8811,859320
≥4/121 in 7.2692682340
≥5/121 in 3016918828181
≥6/121 in 1862728320734
≥7/121 in 1,8462.712,2142,214
≥8/121 in 30,3700.20never in window
≥9/121 in 886,6900.00never in window
≥10/121 in 51,768,0160.00never in window
≥11/121 in 7,585,330,4800.00never in window
≥12/121 in 4,922,879,481,5200.00never in window
Șansa exactă e hipergeometrică și IDENTICĂ la fiecare extragere — tabelul arată cum se compară observatul cu teoria. „Gap curent" = extrageri de la ultima dată când setul a prins ≥prag. Rândurile aurii = absență la nivel de record de fereastră (pur descriptiv).The exact odds are hypergeometric and IDENTICAL at every draw — the table shows how observation compares to theory. "Current gap" = draws since the set last hit ≥threshold. Gold rows = absence at window-record level (purely descriptive).
⚙️ Contribuția numerelor la hiturile setului (fereastra 5,000)Number contribution to the set's hits (window 5,000)
58933 hits · 8.5%
41926 hits · 8.5%
31922 hits · 8.4%
19921 hits · 8.4%
50920 hits · 8.4%
24917 hits · 8.4%
35915 hits · 8.4%
51906 hits · 8.3%
1901 hits · 8.2%
65893 hits · 8.2%
15891 hits · 8.2%
9881 hits · 8.1%
Uniform ar fi ≈8.3% per număr. Descriptiv — ponderea trecută nu se transferă în viitor.Uniform would be ≈8.3% per number. Descriptive — past share does not carry into the future.
💓 Puls — hituri per extragere (ultimele 120)Pulse — hits per draw (last 120)
🕳️ Gap-o-metre — gap curent / record istoric per numărGap gauges — current gap / historical record per number
1
5 / 49
9
1 / 52
15
1 / 53
19
3 / 50
24
2 / 47
31
0 / 54
35
6 / 53
41
6 / 55
50
3 / 55
51
0 / 57
58
13 / 52
65
8 / 71
Indicator pur descriptiv: cât de aproape e absența curentă de recordul istoric al numărului. Fiecare extragere e independentă.Purely descriptive: how close the current absence is to the number's historical record. Every draw is independent.
🧬 ADN-ul setului vs așteptatul formatuluiSet DNA vs format expectation
Set sum399μ=402.0 ±60.1
Odd numbers9/12μ=6.0
Spread (max−min)64μ=55.0
Decades covered7/7μ=6.04
Direct neighbours1μ=2.0
Radar: conturul plin = setul tău; conturul punctat = valoarea așteptată a formatului. Descriptiv.Radar: solid outline = your set; dotted outline = the format's expected value. Descriptive.
🖥️ Verdictul scaneruluiScanner verdict

Scan complete: 12-number set on Czech Keno 12/66 — 132,408 draws in the archive.

Thermal frame (last 50): 15 shows the highest recent frequency (13× vs 9.09 expected), while 58 sits at 5×.

Set thermal state (last 50 draws): NEAR AVERAGE — 108 total hits vs ~109.1 expected (z=-0.1). The recent window does NOT influence the next draw.

Absence gauge: 58 has a current gap of 13 draws (its historical record: 52). Descriptive only — every draw is independent.

Pair chemistry: 31–58 was co-drawn 4212× (expected ≈4074.1).

Over the last 5,000 draws the set hit 0 numbers 316×, 1 number 1200×, 2 numbers 1625×… (theoretical ghost overlaid in the chart). Max observed: 7/12.

Verdict: historical observations, NOT predictions — the odds of every combination are identical at every draw. 18+

Raport generat automat din datele reale (actualizat: 2026-07-11 22:47 UTC). Observații istorice descriptive — șansele oricărei combinații sunt identice la fiecare extragere. Joacă responsabil. 18+Report generated automatically from real data (updated: 2026-07-11 22:47 UTC). Descriptive historical observations — every combination has identical odds at every draw. Play responsibly. 18+