← Înapoi la Czech Keno 12/66Back to Czech Keno 12/66

🛸 UFO X-Ray — set 1, 2, 5, 15, 18, 22, 28, 32, 33, 39, 42, 52

Loteria: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · arhivă: 132,413 extrageri · scanare descriptivă — NU predicție · 18+ Lottery: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · archive: 132,413 draws · descriptive scan — NOT a prediction · 18+
📡 Camera de scanareScan chamber
1
frequency: 24,017× (18.14%)w50: · near averagegap: 1 / record 49
2
frequency: 24,457× (18.47%)w50: · recently coldgap: 3 / record 48
5
frequency: 23,870× (18.03%)w50: · recently coldgap: 1 / record 56
15
frequency: 24,143× (18.23%)w50: 11× · near averagegap: 6 / record 53
18
frequency: 24,135× (18.23%)w50: 10× · near averagegap: 0 / record 54
22
frequency: 24,196× (18.27%)w50: 10× · near averagegap: 0 / record 56
28
frequency: 24,000× (18.13%)w50: 10× · near averagegap: 1 / record 49
32
frequency: 24,012× (18.13%)w50: 10× · near averagegap: 11 / record 52
33
frequency: 23,862× (18.02%)w50: 13× · recently hotgap: 7 / record 49
39
frequency: 23,922× (18.07%)w50: · recently coldgap: 22 / record 46
42
frequency: 24,040× (18.16%)w50: · near averagegap: 0 / record 55
52
frequency: 24,006× (18.13%)w50: · near averagegap: 3 / record 48
🌡️ Starea termică a SETULUI — fereastra 50SET thermal state — 50-draw window
🟢 NEAR AVERAGE — close to expectation
106 hits in the last 50 draws · expected ≈109.1 · z=-0.36
❄ −3σ0🔥 +3σ
last 10 draws: 18 hits (expected ≈21.8) · ~2.18/draw
„Fierbinte" = mai multe hituri decât așteptatul pe ultimele 50 de extrageri; „rece" = mai puține. Stare OBSERVATĂ, nu tendință — fereastra recentă NU influențează următoarea extragere."Hot" = more hits than expected over the last 50 draws; "cold" = fewer. An OBSERVED state, not a trend — the recent window does NOT influence the next draw.
Graful de energie — chimia perechilor (observat vs așteptat, tot istoricul)Energy graph — pair chemistry (observed vs expected, full history)
2–154,216× · expected ≈4,074 · z=2.26
15–424,194× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.91
22–284,163× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.41
18–394,160× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.36
22–524,158× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.33
2–224,155× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.29
show all 66 pairs
2–424,148× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.17
18–224,148× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.17
2–324,147× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.16
2–524,145× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.13
1–224,121× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.74
5–224,118× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.7
22–394,111× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.58
15–284,109× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.55
2–184,107× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.52
32–524,098× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.38
32–334,089× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.23
15–184,086× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.19
1–24,082× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.12
1–184,077× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.04
22–324,076× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.03
2–284,073× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.02
5–424,072× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.04
28–424,068× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.1
18–524,067× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.12
32–424,063× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.18
18–334,061× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.21
15–224,059× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.24
1–284,056× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.29
1–424,054× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.32
5–394,054× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.32
28–394,054× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.32
2–394,053× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.34
33–524,052× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.35
18–284,051× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.37
1–154,047× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.43
39–424,043× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.5
28–334,042× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.51
33–394,040× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.54
15–334,038× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.58
22–334,037× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.59
18–324,031× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.69
5–184,030× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.7
28–324,028× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.74
32–394,028× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.74
33–424,027× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.75
22–424,024× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.8
5–524,021× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.85
15–394,019× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.88
1–54,018× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.9
15–524,016× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.93
2–334,014× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.96
2–54,012× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.99
1–324,004× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.12
42–523,995× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.26
1–523,994× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.28
15–323,993× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.29
18–423,987× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.39
5–333,976× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.56
5–283,970× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.66
5–153,964× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.75
28–523,954× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-1.91
5–323,947× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-2.02
39–523,938× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-2.17
1–393,931× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-2.28
1–333,916× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-2.52
Grosimea liniei = deviația față de așteptatul hipergeometric (z-score). Descriptiv — perechile nu au memorie.Line thickness = deviation vs the hypergeometric expectation (z-score). Descriptive — pairs have no memory.
🧲 Chimie avansată — triplete (fereastra 5.000)Advanced chemistry — triples (window 5,000)
most co-drawn
15–28–4239× · expected ≈24.0 · z=3.06
32–39–4236× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.45
33–42–5236× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.45
1–2–5235× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.24
2–28–3934× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.04
coldest
18–39–5214× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.05
2–32–3313× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.26
1–15–3212× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.46
2–18–2212× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.46
5–15–1812× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-2.46
Cvartete (top/bottom din 495)Quads (top/bottom of 495)
most co-drawn
2–18–32–5210× · expected ≈3.4 · z=3.54
5–15–22–3910× · expected ≈3.4 · z=3.54
2–15–28–429× · expected ≈3.4 · z=3.0
coldest
15–18–22–520× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
15–28–39–520× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
18–33–39–520× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
Din 220 triplete posibile ale setului, pe fereastra recentă. Observat vs așteptat hipergeometric — descriptiv, combinațiile nu au memorie.Out of 220 possible triples of the set, over the recent window. Observed vs hypergeometric expectation — descriptive, combinations have no memory.
📊 Distribuția hiturilor pe ultimele 5,000 extrageri — real vs contur teoreticHit distribution over the last 5,000 draws — observed vs theoretical ghost
0370
11,184
21,534
31,261
4496
5125
626
73
81
90
100
110
120
🎯 Praguri — șanse exacte & absențele setului (fereastra 5,000)Thresholds — exact odds & set absences (window 5,000)
thresholdexact oddsexpected (5,000)observedcurrent gapwindow record
≥1/121 in 1.14,6524,63003
≥2/121 in 1.43,4853,44607
≥3/121 in 2.71,8811,912015
≥4/121 in 7.26926512649
≥5/121 in 3016915526203
≥6/121 in 186273026481
≥7/121 in 1,8462.74262,564
≥8/121 in 30,3700.212,9962,996
≥9/121 in 886,6900.00never in window
≥10/121 in 51,768,0160.00never in window
≥11/121 in 7,585,330,4800.00never in window
≥12/121 in 4,922,879,481,5200.00never in window
Șansa exactă e hipergeometrică și IDENTICĂ la fiecare extragere — tabelul arată cum se compară observatul cu teoria. „Gap curent" = extrageri de la ultima dată când setul a prins ≥prag. Rândurile aurii = absență la nivel de record de fereastră (pur descriptiv).The exact odds are hypergeometric and IDENTICAL at every draw — the table shows how observation compares to theory. "Current gap" = draws since the set last hit ≥threshold. Gold rows = absence at window-record level (purely descriptive).
⚙️ Contribuția numerelor la hiturile setului (fereastra 5,000)Number contribution to the set's hits (window 5,000)
2948 hits · 8.8%
22929 hits · 8.6%
33919 hits · 8.5%
42914 hits · 8.4%
5904 hits · 8.3%
52903 hits · 8.3%
1902 hits · 8.3%
15891 hits · 8.2%
18887 hits · 8.2%
39887 hits · 8.2%
28873 hits · 8.1%
32872 hits · 8.1%
Uniform ar fi ≈8.3% per număr. Descriptiv — ponderea trecută nu se transferă în viitor.Uniform would be ≈8.3% per number. Descriptive — past share does not carry into the future.
💓 Puls — hituri per extragere (ultimele 120)Pulse — hits per draw (last 120)
🕳️ Gap-o-metre — gap curent / record istoric per numărGap gauges — current gap / historical record per number
1
1 / 49
2
3 / 48
5
1 / 56
15
6 / 53
18
0 / 54
22
0 / 56
28
1 / 49
32
11 / 52
33
7 / 49
39
22 / 46
42
0 / 55
52
3 / 48
Indicator pur descriptiv: cât de aproape e absența curentă de recordul istoric al numărului. Fiecare extragere e independentă.Purely descriptive: how close the current absence is to the number's historical record. Every draw is independent.
🧬 ADN-ul setului vs așteptatul formatuluiSet DNA vs format expectation
Set sum289μ=402.0 ±60.1
Odd numbers5/12μ=6.0
Spread (max−min)51μ=55.0
Decades covered6/7μ=6.04
Direct neighbours2μ=2.0
Radar: conturul plin = setul tău; conturul punctat = valoarea așteptată a formatului. Descriptiv.Radar: solid outline = your set; dotted outline = the format's expected value. Descriptive.
🖥️ Verdictul scaneruluiScanner verdict

Scan complete: 12-number set on Czech Keno 12/66 — 132,413 draws in the archive.

Thermal frame (last 50): 33 shows the highest recent frequency (13× vs 9.09 expected), while 39 sits at 4×.

Set thermal state (last 50 draws): NEAR AVERAGE — 106 total hits vs ~109.1 expected (z=-0.4). The recent window does NOT influence the next draw.

Absence gauge: 39 has a current gap of 22 draws (its historical record: 46). Descriptive only — every draw is independent.

Pair chemistry: 2–15 was co-drawn 4216× (expected ≈4074.2).

Over the last 5,000 draws the set hit 0 numbers 370×, 1 number 1184×, 2 numbers 1534×… (theoretical ghost overlaid in the chart). Max observed: 8/12.

Verdict: historical observations, NOT predictions — the odds of every combination are identical at every draw. 18+

Raport generat automat din datele reale (actualizat: 2026-07-11 22:50 UTC). Observații istorice descriptive — șansele oricărei combinații sunt identice la fiecare extragere. Joacă responsabil. 18+Report generated automatically from real data (updated: 2026-07-11 22:50 UTC). Descriptive historical observations — every combination has identical odds at every draw. Play responsibly. 18+