← Înapoi la Czech Keno 12/66Back to Czech Keno 12/66

🛸 UFO X-Ray — set 1, 12, 25, 29, 30, 39, 53, 61

Loteria: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · arhivă: 132,408 extrageri · scanare descriptivă — NU predicție · 18+ Lottery: Czech Keno 12/66 (12/66, draws every ~1 minute) · archive: 132,408 draws · descriptive scan — NOT a prediction · 18+
📡 Camera de scanareScan chamber
1
frequency: 24,016× (18.14%)w50: 9× · near averagegap: 5 / record 49
12
frequency: 24,173× (18.26%)w50: 5× · recently coldgap: 3 / record 49
25
frequency: 24,109× (18.21%)w50: 8× · near averagegap: 12 / record 60
29
frequency: 24,176× (18.26%)w50: 8× · near averagegap: 6 / record 51
30
frequency: 24,096× (18.2%)w50: 8× · near averagegap: 1 / record 66
39
frequency: 23,922× (18.07%)w50: 4× · recently coldgap: 17 / record 46
53
frequency: 24,087× (18.19%)w50: 12× · recently hotgap: 2 / record 54
61
frequency: 24,037× (18.15%)w50: 7× · near averagegap: 9 / record 42
🌡️ Starea termică a SETULUI — fereastra 50SET thermal state — 50-draw window
❄️ RUNNING COLD — below expectation
61 hits in the last 50 draws · expected ≈72.7 · z=-1.61
❄ −3σ0🔥 +3σ
last 10 draws: 12 hits (expected ≈14.5) · ~1.45/draw
„Fierbinte" = mai multe hituri decât așteptatul pe ultimele 50 de extrageri; „rece" = mai puține. Stare OBSERVATĂ, nu tendință — fereastra recentă NU influențează următoarea extragere."Hot" = more hits than expected over the last 50 draws; "cold" = fewer. An OBSERVED state, not a trend — the recent window does NOT influence the next draw.
⚡ Graful de energie — chimia perechilor (observat vs așteptat, tot istoricul)Energy graph — pair chemistry (observed vs expected, full history)
12–294,237× · expected ≈4,074 · z=2.59
1–124,197× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.96
12–304,193× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.89
12–534,173× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.57
1–254,167× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.48
12–614,153× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.26
show all 28 pairs
25–294,149× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.19
25–394,147× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.16
30–614,146× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.14
39–614,142× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.08
29–394,139× · expected ≈4,074 · z=1.03
29–534,135× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.97
1–294,122× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.76
1–614,119× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.71
1–534,116× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.67
12–394,112× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.6
29–614,076× · expected ≈4,074 · z=0.03
25–304,061× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.21
29–304,061× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.21
25–534,056× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.29
53–614,052× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.35
39–534,044× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.48
30–534,042× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.51
12–254,039× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.56
30–394,035× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.62
25–614,016× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-0.92
1–303,942× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-2.1
1–393,931× · expected ≈4,074 · z=-2.28
Grosimea liniei = deviația față de așteptatul hipergeometric (z-score). Descriptiv — perechile nu au memorie.Line thickness = deviation vs the hypergeometric expectation (z-score). Descriptive — pairs have no memory.
🧲 Chimie avansată — triplete (fereastra 5.000)Advanced chemistry — triples (window 5,000)
most co-drawn
1–30–6135× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.24
30–53–6135× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.24
29–53–6134× · expected ≈24.0 · z=2.04
25–29–5331× · expected ≈24.0 · z=1.42
1–29–3028× · expected ≈24.0 · z=0.81
coldest
25–30–3917× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.44
1–12–6116× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.64
12–29–3916× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.64
25–53–6116× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.64
12–25–3915× · expected ≈24.0 · z=-1.85
Cvartete (top/bottom din 70)Quads (top/bottom of 70)
most co-drawn
1–29–30–617× · expected ≈3.4 · z=1.92
1–12–30–616× · expected ≈3.4 · z=1.39
12–25–29–616× · expected ≈3.4 · z=1.39
coldest
29–30–39–531× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.31
1–25–29–300× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
1–25–53–610× · expected ≈3.4 · z=-1.85
Din 56 triplete posibile ale setului, pe fereastra recentă. Observat vs așteptat hipergeometric — descriptiv, combinațiile nu au memorie.Out of 56 possible triples of the set, over the recent window. Observed vs hypergeometric expectation — descriptive, combinations have no memory.
📊 Distribuția hiturilor pe ultimele 5,000 extrageri — real vs contur teoreticHit distribution over the last 5,000 draws — observed vs theoretical ghost
0911
11,789
21,537
3632
4115
514
62
70
80
🎯 Praguri — șanse exacte & absențele setului (fereastra 5,000)Thresholds — exact odds & set absences (window 5,000)
thresholdexact oddsexpected (5,000)observedcurrent gapwindow record
≥1/81 in 1.24,0944,08914
≥2/81 in 2.22,2442,300315
≥3/81 in 6.6760763945
≥4/81 in 3215513138202
≥5/81 in 2731816496795
≥6/81 in 4,2061.222,0352,546
≥7/81 in 132,7600.00never in window—
≥8/81 in 11,603,1760.00never in window—
Șansa exactă e hipergeometrică și IDENTICĂ la fiecare extragere — tabelul arată cum se compară observatul cu teoria. „Gap curent" = extrageri de la ultima dată când setul a prins ≥prag. Rândurile aurii = absență la nivel de record de fereastră (pur descriptiv).The exact odds are hypergeometric and IDENTICAL at every draw — the table shows how observation compares to theory. "Current gap" = draws since the set last hit ≥threshold. Gold rows = absence at window-record level (purely descriptive).
⚙️ Contribuția numerelor la hiturile setului (fereastra 5,000)Number contribution to the set's hits (window 5,000)
61953 hits · 13.1%
30944 hits · 12.9%
53940 hits · 12.9%
29908 hits · 12.4%
1901 hits · 12.3%
25889 hits · 12.2%
39887 hits · 12.1%
12879 hits · 12.0%
Uniform ar fi ≈12.5% per număr. Descriptiv — ponderea trecută nu se transferă în viitor.Uniform would be ≈12.5% per number. Descriptive — past share does not carry into the future.
💓 Puls — hituri per extragere (ultimele 120)Pulse — hits per draw (last 120)
🕳️ Gap-o-metre — gap curent / record istoric per numărGap gauges — current gap / historical record per number
1
5 / 49
12
3 / 49
25
12 / 60
29
6 / 51
30
1 / 66
39
17 / 46
53
2 / 54
61
9 / 42
Indicator pur descriptiv: cât de aproape e absența curentă de recordul istoric al numărului. Fiecare extragere e independentă.Purely descriptive: how close the current absence is to the number's historical record. Every draw is independent.
🧬 ADN-ul setului vs așteptatul formatuluiSet DNA vs format expectation
Set sum250μ=268.0 ±50.9
Odd numbers6/8μ=4.0
Spread (max−min)60μ=50.6
Decades covered6/7μ=5.07
Direct neighbours1μ=0.85
Radar: conturul plin = setul tău; conturul punctat = valoarea așteptată a formatului. Descriptiv.Radar: solid outline = your set; dotted outline = the format's expected value. Descriptive.
🖥️ Verdictul scaneruluiScanner verdict

Scan complete: 8-number set on Czech Keno 12/66 — 132,408 draws in the archive.

Thermal frame (last 50): 53 shows the highest recent frequency (12× vs 9.09 expected), while 39 sits at 4×.

Set thermal state (last 50 draws): RUNNING COLD (below expectation) — 61 total hits vs ~72.7 expected (z=-1.6). The recent window does NOT influence the next draw.

Absence gauge: 39 has a current gap of 17 draws (its historical record: 46). Descriptive only — every draw is independent.

Pair chemistry: 12–29 was co-drawn 4237× (expected ≈4074.1).

Over the last 5,000 draws the set hit 0 numbers 911×, 1 number 1789×, 2 numbers 1537×… (theoretical ghost overlaid in the chart). Max observed: 6/8.

Verdict: historical observations, NOT predictions — the odds of every combination are identical at every draw. 18+

Raport generat automat din datele reale (actualizat: 2026-07-11 22:49 UTC). Observații istorice descriptive — șansele oricărei combinații sunt identice la fiecare extragere. Joacă responsabil. 18+Report generated automatically from real data (updated: 2026-07-11 22:49 UTC). Descriptive historical observations — every combination has identical odds at every draw. Play responsibly. 18+